Should a review be served as "FAST FOOD" or a "SEVEN-COURSE MEAL"?
Follow my blog with Bloglovin I personally detest long reviews that simply restate everything that's
in the book blurb with very little personal input. I much prefer short
reviews that give me the reviewer's strongest and most lasting
impression of the overall story, things they like or didn't like, or
the factual and emotional impact. I don't want to know all the
high and low points, or every small fact about the
characters, plot, and setting. As a perspective reader, I'd like to
discover those things for myself.
Well that's my opinion, now I'd like
to know what kind of book review you prefer to read.